Benutzer:Gerda Arendt/Spielwiese

1. Allein Gott in der Höh sei Ehr
2. Alles ist an Gottes Segen
3. Aus meines Herzens Grunde
4. Christus, der ist mein Leben
5. Dir, dir, Jehovah, will ich singen
6. Erschienen ist der herrlich' Tag
7. Herr Jesu Christ, dich zu uns wend
8. Freu' dich sehr, O meine Seele'
9. Gott des Himmels und der Erden
10. Herr, wie du willst, so schick's mit mir
11. Herzlich tut mich verlangen
12. Jauchz, Erd, und Himmel, juble hell
13. Ich dank dir, lieber Herre
14. Ich will dich lieben, meine Stärke
15. Jerusalem, du hochgebaute Stadt
16. Jesu Leiden, Pein und Tod
17. Jesus, meine Zuversicht
18. Komm, o komm, du Geist des Lebens
19. Lobe Gott, ihr Christen alle gleich
20. Mach's mit mir, Gott, nach deiner Güt
21. Meinen Jesum laß' ich nicht
22. Nun danket alle Gott
23. Nun freut euch, lieben Christen
24. O Gott, du frommer Gott
25. O Jesu Christ, meines Lebens Licht
26. O Welt, ich muß dich lassen
27. Schmücke dich, o liebe Seele
28. Seelenbräutigam
29. Sollt' ich meinem Gott nicht singen?
30. Von Gott will ich nicht lassen
31. Werde munter, mein Gemüte
32. Wie wohl ist mir, o Freund der Seelen
33. Jesus ist kommen
34. O wie selig

Der Chor in einem Gottesdienst in St. Martin, Idstein 2009

OREYA ist ein gemischter Kammerchor a cappella aus Schytomyr, Ukraine, der international in Konzerten und Wettbewerben auftritt.

Geschichte

Der Chor wurde 1986 von Alexander Vatsek gegründet, der die Gruppe seitdem leitet. Der Schwerpunkt liegt einerseits auf Musik aus der Ukraine, andererseits auf internationaler Chormusik durch die Jahrhunderte, mit Werken wie zum Beispiel Alfred Schnittkes Pater Noster, Samuel Barbers Agnus Dei, Eric Whitacres Lux Aurumque, Arvo Pärts Kyrie und Hyo-Won Woos Gloria (1972).

Der Chor errang Preise bei internationalen Chorwettbewerben wir dem Internationalen Robert Schumann Chorwettbewerb und dem 14. Internationalen Kammerchor-Wettbewerb Marktoberdorf 2015, bei dem OREYA unter anderem einen Sonderpreis für die beste Interpretation eines geistlichen Chorwers für Schnittkes Lord Jesus Christ erhielt. OREYA trat bei der Aachener Biennale 2009 sowohl in Einzelkonzerten auf als auch im Abschlusskonzert gemeinsam mit sechs anderen internationalen Chören in Leonard Bernsteins "Kaddish".

Daniel Honsack, ein Rezensent des Wiesbadener Tagblatts, schrieb über ihr Konzert in St. Martin, Idstein: „Der Chor beeindruckt mit sanfter Nachhaltigkeit und eindringlicher Schärfe. Verblüffend ist die klangliche Homogenität, die auch bei scheinbar chaotischer Choraufstellung beibehalten wird. Die einzelnen Stimmgruppen glänzen durch eigenständige Klangfarben, die sich immer wieder neu zusammenmischen lassen.“

Im Juni 2016 trat der Choir Israel auf, gemeinsam mit dem Gary Bertini Israel Choir, in Galakonzerten des Israel Philharmonic Orchestra, geleitet von Vasily Petrenko, in Rachmaninoffs Chorsinfonie Die Glocken.

External links

• Offizielle Webpräsenz (englisch)
• Schnittke, Alfred, Pater Noster, OREYA choir a cappella auf YouTube
• EGP 2012, Chamber Choir Oreya, Ukraine, Conductor: Alexander Vatsek auf YouTube
• Gloria – Hyo-won Woo, OREYA auf YouTube

Einzelnachweise

Kategorie:Gegründet 1986 Kategorie:Gemischter Chor Kategorie:Kammerchor

Evidence

• It is evident that a reader is helped by a reference to time in history and location in geography, as an infobox can supply, for example BWV 10.
• It is evident that an infobox should summarize key facts of the article, for example Carmen. It is a myth that it can summarize the article.
• It is evident that an infobox emits metadata.
• It is evident that an infobox written by a different user mirrors how an article is understood, as a good feedback.
• It is evident that the removal of an infobox excludes comments from readers who will typically not search in the history of an article.
• It is evident that there is no ban for infoboxes on talk pages. Or is it?
• It is evident that a million readers in July 2013 did not complain about the infobox in Franz Kafka.

Tommy20000 comments on TFA scheduled for wrong date http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Today%27s_featured_article/requests&diff=507296929&oldid=507295753

The following discussion was initiated by Gerda Arendt (Diskussion • Beiträge • gelöschte Beiträge • hochgeladene Dateien • SBL-Log • Sperr-Logbuch • globale Beiträge • SUL • Logbuch • sperren) in June 2013.

I dream of the day that the infobox is a simple tool of accessibility.

Archive 2017

Table of inclusions of musical composition infoboxes

{{Infobox musical composition}} {{Infobox Bach composition}} {{Infobox opera}}

2017 stats

For comparison, the numbers of a year ago are in brackets for January.

Date	Composition	Bach	Opera
1 Jan 2017	723 (513)	216 (203)	491 (199)
1 Feb 2017	766	216	519
1 Mar 2017	796	216	555
1 Apr 2017	868	219	651
1 May 2017	915	219	709
1 Jun 2017	966	219	748
19 Aug 2017	1080	220	846
19 Aug 2017	1080	220	846

latest entry (the tool was down on 1 August) --Gerda Arendt (Diskussion) 11:03, 1. Sep. 2017 (CEST)

2016 stats

For comparison, the numbers of a year ago are in brackets for January.

Date	Composition	Bach	Opera
1 Jan 2016	513 (256)	203 (185)	199 (100)
1 Mar 2016	548	207	222
4 Apr 2016	583	208	264
1 May 2016	609	208	277
1 Jun 2016	626	210	294
1 Jul 2016	632	210	318
1 Aug 2016	652	211	346
1 Sep 2016	666	210	?
1 Oct 2016	702	211	395
1 Nov 2016	701	212	422
1 Dec 2016	706	212	454
31 Dec 2016	723	216	491

2015 stats

Date	Composition	Bach	Opera
1 Jan 2015	256	185	100
2 Feb 2015	293	186	118
2 Mar 2015	334	186	123
2 Apr 2015	349	187	127
2 May 2015	357	187	131
2 Jun 2015	369	187	136
1 Jul 2015	409	189	143
1 Aug 2015	422	188	157
30 Aug 2015	433	193	164
1 Oct 2015	440	196	170
1 Nov 2015	444	197	177
1 Dec 2015	453	199	180
31 Dec 2015	498	202	184

Discussions and reverts

The dates indicate when an infobox was installed that was later reverted, or suggested but not accepted. Colour indicates no infobox.

The list has been called the infobox warriors' hit list. It is not. (If we were warriors we would keep it secret.) It is mainly a list of infoboxes that have been reverted. It was begun during the 2013 arbcase about infoboxes, but reverts still happen, while members of this project believe that an infobox serves some readers (see project page) and should be kept. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:26, 24 August 2016 (UTC)

Article	type	date
en:Agrippina (opera)	opera	8 Jan
en:Rinaldo (opera)	opera	9 Jan
en:Pierre Boulez	person	5 Feb
en:Georges Bizet	person	8 Feb
en:Youth on the Prow, and Pleasure at the Helm	artwork	9 Feb
en:Claudio Monteverdi	classical composer	9 Feb
en:Fidelio	opera	21 Feb
en:Peter Maxwell Davies	classical composer	14 Mar
en:Max Reger	person	23 Feb
en:Mary, mother of Jesus	saint	2 Jun
en:Pelléas et Mélisande (opera)	opera	17 Jul
Orlando paladino	opera	25 Jul
en:Frankie Grande	person	30 Jul
en:Stanley Brett	person	1 Aug
en:Giulio Cesare	opera	1 Aug
en:Handel's lost Hamburg operas	opera	2 Aug
en:Guerilla Cricket	radio show	3 Aug
en:Kelly's of Cornwall	company	18 Aug
en:La princesse jaune	opera	29 Aug
en:Die Fledermaus	opera	31 Aug
en:Le duc d'Albe	opera	1 Sep

latest entry --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:27, 1 September 2016 (UTC)

Questions and answers

Ched

Are we supposed to discuss and talk here on the talk page? Or are you hoping others will edit the main/user page? — Ched :  ?  10:03, 27 June 2013 (UTC)

...and I will watchlist (for all the good that will do me - or anyone else for that matter. I'm absolutely TERRIBLE at following others editors. In fact, I'm terrible at following my own "samned duff" — Ched :  ?  10:10, 27 June 2013 (UTC)

For the moment, I would prefer discussion on this talk. My statements on the user page are still growing and need my own sorting ;) - I will incorporate good ideas from here when their time comes. - Feel free to add infoboxes that got under the rug to here for discussion, adding just a link on the user page, adding at the bottom. I intentionally left their former discussions behind (all easy to find in case of interest), in order to get a new perspective, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:20, 27 June 2013 (UTC)

Are infoboxes useful?

Yes, I think they can be, when they provide different information or pull together salient points (often with wikilinks) that are scattered through the article and are hard to find for readers that do not want to read the entire article. However, when most of the items in the infobox merely repeat points generally found in the first paragraph of the lead, then I think they are more of a distraction than an aid. --Robert.Allen (talk) 23:29, 7 July 2013 (UTC)

If you read the article you will understand that they are useful even if they only give a time and a location, as an opera libretto will tell you at what time and location a story takes place. You will understand that the time in granular form is different (and useful for many purposes) from the string, even if it looks the same. (And if you read the history, you will see that I argued exactly like you in March 2012.) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:38, 8 July 2013 (UTC)

One of the big problems with the bad boxes, is that the people putting them up don't read the (sensible) infobox guidelines. Infoboxes are an old fashioned, arguably outdated, way of presenting key information, and they must be actually useful to the reader to be viable. They are not decorative flourishes to satisfy editorial egos. Kleinzach 01:30, 11 July 2013 (UTC)

"They are not decorative flourishes to satisfy editorial egos" Indeed not. The rest of your comment is unsubstantiated and/ or bollocks. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 22:03, 11 July 2013 (UTC)

What an unpleasantly uncolleaguely remark from Pigsonthewing! Most offputting, even to those inclined to give him the benefit of the doubt when he is on the offensive. Tim riley (talk) 19:36, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

It does something for me, a human reader

Re: Talk:José Carlos Cocarelli#Box Answering here, because it might be of broader interest than a talk page of a less prominent pianist, where I said bout the infobox:

It does something for me, a human reader, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:56, 23 July 2014 (UTC)

Can you explain what? Fut.Perf. ☼ 07:58, 23 July 2014 (UTC)

I will try.

As a reader: I like articles structured in a similar way. I like to look at the familiar spot to find key facts (not a summary). In this case, I would like to see that he is a pianist right on top, but the template is not there yet. It was tried, see Percy Grainger.

As an editor: I like to know that "my" data can be reused by programs and translation roboters. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:35, 23 July 2014 (UTC)

"Ausgabe" info and the other box

At Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Classical music#Lead for Mozart masses I suggested to postpone re-opening discussions on the infoboxes for Mozart masses.

Well, here I am back, also explaining one of the reasons I wanted to postpone then: at Talk:List of masses by Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart#Jack's riddle: the solution I had suggested to include the AMA/NMA info in the box, which was executed for the model boxes shown here and here.

...which made me realise there are some problems:

1. Increases the surface of the infobox, not exactly what would make those not liking them start to like them more;
2. In my view infoboxes should work as a summary, not displaying info not found elsewhere in the article;
3. External links are forbidden in infoboxes, so when IMSLP has the AMA version of the score (they usually do), it is not possible to provide a convenience link from the infobox (which for me would be one of the more interesting reasons why one would give the boring "Series X Volume y No. z" info anyways).
4. The previous are only "circumstantial" objections. The main, and quite principal, objection is: why would one give only the info of "one" active commercial publisher of these scores (in casu Bärenreiter), not the info on the others providing Urtext editions? I mean, K. and Vorlage:D. numbers are somewhat universal, they existed before they got intertwined with the Bärenreiter commercial score-publishing activity (and for Schubert at least they continued to exist outside that realm: the 1995 American Deutsch catalogue was not based on the 1978 Bärenreiter version). The NMA/NSE classifications lack such independence, they refer to a particular publisher. Why would one publisher's commercial info be given, overriding efforts by other publishers in that field? I don't underestimate Bärenreiter's efforts, sometimes publishing rare versions not published before, but in the score-publishing business they are for most scores "one out of many".

Prior to fathoming the impact of what has been called infobox-wars, I had invented something else to overcome these difficulties, which you can see here: {{Schubert scores}}. The box is currently shown in

• Piano Sonata in E major D. 157 (Schubert)
• Piano Sonata in C major D. 279 (Schubert)
• Piano Sonata in A-flat major D. 557 (Schubert)

Such box also replaces the {{IMSLP2}} template in these articles: the advantage being that the IMSLP template refers only to the linked score as if there was no other one, not even close to drawing attention that the AMA/AGA scores on that website maybe have lost their "commercial" value, but also by definition have missed out on over a century of scholarship. The "scores" template on the other hand puts it all together. You can see Schubert's autograph of the entire piece via a direct link (when available), the 19th century publication date of the AGA version is given before the link at IMSLP, all Urtext editions can be linked, including the Bärenreiter/NSE one.

(just taking a short break when typing this, Schubert's D 574 on the radio — yeah that's why these mindnumbing discussions on boxes and scores and wars and DRNs have any meaning, don't they: the music is just too beautiful)

I'd like to work out a particular example of this: the third entry of the scores box in the D 279 article: until recently D 309A was "deest". Bärenreiter claims to have been the first to publish it. Now it is possible to purchase that publication (only 219,00 € ...). But here's what Wikipedia can do: give a direct link to how Schubert wrote it down, so you can see for yourself whether or not you want to have a paper version of that score. And links to both the website where a facsimile copy can be bought, and the Bärenreiter publication. No discrimination among those providing a printed version of the score (neither among those that offer a downloadable version free or otherwise, not giving the impression the "free" ones are the only ones worth linking to).

Also the fourth entry of that same box, on D 346, is interesting. Schubert's autograph leaves the piece unfinished. So nor the autographs website, nor AGA/NSE add a note to that. There are a few notable completions (discussed in various reliable sources). The scores box allows links to where the scores of these completions can be obtained, along the links to the unfinished versions offered by OAW/AGA/NSE. All sorts of things not possible with the very confining IMSLP2 template.

Now here's the catch. The Schubert scores template didn't go down very well:

• its workshop version got nuked here: Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2014 August 8#Template:Piano sonata in E major (D. 157)/Scores
• an attempt at reviving the discussion was a minor "lack of success"

So I put the whole idea on hold until... I realized the AMA/NMA additions to infoboxes were not part of a better solution either.

In short, two things:

1. I withdraw my suggestion to add AMA/NMA info to infoboxes: imho it is not something good to do.
2. I humbly ask to give your opinion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Classical music/Compositions task force#Scores template, I'd value your opinion very much. --Francis Schonken (talk) 15:03, 27 September 2014 (UTC)

Arguments against infoboxes

In discussions about infobox I meet arguments against infoboxes that I find debatable. Some occur regularly, some less frequently. My response is to how I understand the argument, which may differ from how it was intended. The first comment is mine, feel free to add.

undue

"I have no objection per se to boxes for compositions, so long as they conform to WP:UNDUE."

• The reader should be helped by an infobox regardless how far the article is developed.

summary

"An infobox is supposed to summarise the article."

• It has to summarize key facts of the article.

not needed

"An infobox is not needed for this article."

• Of course not, but it can be helpful.

redundant

"The infobox ... would contain only redundant information."

• An infobox has to be redundant by design.

barrier

"It also presents a barrier to new contributors."

• If it does, a hidden notice could help.

default status quo

"We default to the status quo"

• There is no progess in sticking to the status quo.

discussed before

"This was discussed back in ..."

• Consensus can change.

misrepresentation

"It misrepresents the content of the article."

• If it does, parameters can be fixed or omitted without reverting the box.

future misrepresentation

"It is absolutely certain that once an infobox is in place, editors will try to extend the detail, adding stuff likely to mislead or misrepresent."

• If it happens (not so certain) it can easily be reverted.

image size

"The image that goes at the top is reduced to a size that completely obviates its function and ruins the visual effect."

• The image size can be adjusted.

wasted space

"The box would waste space at the top of article."

• Fear not, there is no space limit. Often the infobox fills white space next to the TOC.

attention

"The reader's attention should be directed immediately into the key information of the article, which is well-presented in the lead."

• If there is an image, the reader's attention will go there. An infobox can provide him at a glance key facts, for example a composer's name, which appears in the lead only after help to pronounce, translation(s), subtitle, etc.

lazy reader

"They cater for the lazy reader."

• They don't cater, they help by supplying key facts, to any reader who looks for them.

ugly

"Infoboxes are ... aesthetically ugly. ... Let's not add another eyesore to another beautifully crafted article."

• POV, and if really ugly, they can be changed.

author

"We as the authors want people to read our contributions which we have written and researched for many months."

• You may want to respect also what different readers want.

no education

"To encourage readers to simply rely on the text within the infobox, does nothing for the potential educational values which our articles have to offer."

• A reader who needs a simple fact will be served better by an infobox, and the other education is still there, undiminuished.

contentious

"Infoboxes are frequently contentious."

• Is infobox is "contentious" for the given article.

distracting

"The new infobox opera is distracting."

• The replaced side navbox, navigating away from the article, seems more distracting.

seems

"The new infobox opera seems to me clunky, intrusive, pointless ..."

• Point of view

pattern

"It's part of the tabular, caption-plus-content pattern of infoboxes."

• It's a wanted structured design.

not for newcomer

"It doesn't help the opera newcomer understand what Rigoletto is."

• It doesn't have to. (Not even the article can fully do that.) It tells the newcomer the composer sooner than the lead.

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:22, 25 August 2013 (UTC)

I made the former list to prose, for easier linking. Note that I didn't touch the topics metadata ad microformats. I detailed explanation of microformats emitted by an infobox is presented by RexxS on Talk:Mont Juic (suite). --Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:46, 26 August 2013 (UTC)

unneccessary

edit summary

• Yes, so are images. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:38, 6 October 2014 (UTC)

Open for discussion

Chopin

Infobox added by a new user, reverted and discussed, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:41, 7 April 2014 (UTC)

Older cases

Orlando furioso, Motezuma (March 2013)

By others: Isaac Stern (2008) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:42, 6 October 2014 (UTC)

Infoboxes for discussion

Compare articles, with infobox and without

The following sortable table shows several infoboxes which are/were installed or suggested recently (mostly in 2013) and are under debate. The table is not comprehensive, additions are welcome. Infoboxes include the types {{Infobox person}}, {{Infobox musician}}, {{Infobox artwork}}, {{Infobox organization}}, {{Infobox Bach composition}} (short: Bach), {{Infobox musical composition}} (short: musical), {{Infobox opera}}, {{Infobox church}}. "Successful" infoboxes, installed by a principle author of an article and unquestioned, such as most works by Johann Sebastian Bach, are not listed, but those of his works where the infobox was not kept unchanged. Infoboxes that were liked by authors, such as the Schubert masses, are also not shown.

Reactions to added infoboxes range from a complete revert to collapsing of sections, shortening by deletion of parameters or information, and discussion. The latter is wanted. It can be improved by leaving an infobox in place for a certain minimum time, to also gain input from readers.

One aspect of the following table may be to look at the (sometimes amazingly short) time between installation of an infobox and its revert.

The table entries are sorted by date of installation/suggestion of an infobox but can be sorted by other fields.

Table of debated infoboxes

	Article	type	date	added	suggested	by	author?	date	reverted	changed	by	author?	status	notes
1	Symphony No. 1 (Bruckner)	musical	2007/08/10	add infobox		Gc	yes	2013/07/11		tr[im]	Nikkimaria	no	shortened	similar in other symphonies
2	Philipp Glass	musician	2009/05/16	infobox		Hyacinth	yes	2009/05/18	rm infobox per ...		Kleinzach	no	shortened	long discussion, several types of infobox
3	Andreas Scholl	person	2012/11/28	[1]		IP	no	2013/07/11		by all means, wait ...	Nikkimaria	no	Vorlage:Y infobox	one of my favourite edits: we should propagate good ideas whenever we find them
4	Arthur Worsley	person	2012/12/19	iBox		Andy	edits	2012/12/30	rm, rm OR, fmt		Nikkimaria	no	Vorlage:Y infobox
5	Carleton W. Angell	person	2012/12/21	iBox		Andy	edits	2012/12/22	cleanup		Nikkimaria	no	Vorlage:Y infobox
6	Forsbrook Pendant	artwork	2012/12/29	ibox		Andy	yes	2012/12/30	rm, fmt		Nikkimaria	no	Vorlage:Y infobox
7	Dancing Barry	person	2012/12/30	iBox		Andy	edits	2012/12/31	rm		Nikkimaria	no	Vorlage:Y infobox
8	Mass in B minor structure	Bach	2013/01/01	try infobox		GA	yes	2013/01/01		rm list, fmt	Nikkimaria	no	infobox	long discussion, compromise: partly collapsed
9	BWV 105	Bach	2013/01/01	try infobox		GA	no	2013/01/01	No thanks, Gerda, this infrobox is absolutely horrendous and ugly		Mathsci	yes		tried 2 more times
10	Robert Callahan (judge)	person	2013/01/02	iBox		Andy	edits	2013/01/02	rm, cleanup		Nikkimaria	no
11	Hans Severus Ziegler	person	2013/01/02	iBox		Andy	no	2013/01/02	rm, cleanup		Nikkimaria	no	Vorlage:Y infobox
12	Lloyd Hartman Elliott	person	2013/01/02	iBox		Andy	no	2013/01/03	rm, cleanup		Nikkimaria	no	Vorlage:Y infobox
13	Howell Conant	person	2013/01/07	iBox		Andy	no	2013/01/08		cleanup	Nikkimaria	no	shortened
14	Messiah structure	musical	2013/01/08	start infobox		GA	yes	2013/04/02		rm lists ...	Nikkimaria	no	shortened
15	Christopher Pinchbeck	person	2013/01/17	fmt		Andy	no	2013/01/18		cleanup, tag	Nikkimaria	no	Vorlage:Y infobox
16	Russian Symphony Orchestra Society	musical artist	2013/01/29	template		Andy	edits	2013/01/30	cleanup		Nikkimaria	no	Vorlage:Y infobox	reverted, collapsed, hidden, see talk
17	Renaissance Theatre Company	organization	2013/02/19	imrovements		Andy	edits	2013/02/20	rm, org, fmt		Nikkimaria	no	Vorlage:Y infobox	reverted and moved several times
18	Messiah Part I	musical	2013/02/23	start infobox		GA	yes						Vorlage:Y infobox	and Parts II and III on Handel's birthday
19	Cathedral of Blessed Mother Teresa in Pristina	church	2013/03/01	image +		Andy	yes	2013/03/02	rm, fmt		Nikkimaria	no	collapsed	move, then revert, several times
20	Robert Stoepel	person	2013/03/04	Infobox from Gerda		kosboot	yes	2013/03/22	WP:COMPOSERS; MOS:.		Toccata quarta	no	Vorlage:Y infobox
21	Peter Planyavsky	person	2013/03/04	start infobox		GA	yes	2013/03/04	compresses badly		Nikkimaria	no	shortened	several reverts, position move, collapse, and talk
22	Penns Hall	building	2013/03/10	iBox		Andy	edits	2013/03/10	cleanup, tag		Nikkimaria	no		reverted again 16 July
23	Reginald Aspinwall	person	2013/03/13	+		Andy	no	2013/03/14	rm, fmt		Nikkimaria	no		reverted again 16 July
24	Johann Sebastian Bach	person	2013/03/21		Birthday	GA	edits						opposed
25	George Frideric Handel	person	2013/03/25		Mini-infobox	GA	no						opposed
26	St Matthew Passion structure	Bach	2013/03/28	infobox		GA	yes	2013/04/01		rm long lists and doubled param	Nikkimaria	no	shortened, collapsed sections	several changes and long discussion
27	Holzhausenschlösschen	building	2013/03/30	various		Andy	edits	2013/04/01	rm empty ...		Nikkimaria	no	Vorlage:Y infobox
28	Sparrow Mass	musical	2013/03/30	infobox		GA	no	2013/07/11	cleanup		Nikkimaria	no		edit war, see below
29	BWV 103	Bach	2013/04/15	infobox		GA	yes	2013/07/11		rm long list	Nikkimaria	no	Vorlage:Y infobox	long debate
30	St Mary's, Bryanston Square	church	2013/04/15	template		Andy	no	2013/04/16	rm huge block of template text; assorted formatting fixes; tr		Nikkimaria	no	collapsed
31	St. Severin, Keitum	church	2013/04/26	start infobox		GA	no	2013/07/11	(no edit summary)		Nikkimaria	no	Vorlage:Y infobox
32	Jochem Hendricks	person	2013/05/02	+		Andy	no	2013/05/03	rm empty params, fmt		Nikkimaria	no	Vorlage:Y infobox
33	Sally Ryan	person	2013/05/02	+		Andy	no	2013/05/03		rm empty params, rm unsourced, fmt, ce	Nikkimaria	no	Vorlage:Y infobox	changed several times
34	The Rite of Spring	musical	2013/05/30		Infobox	Andy	no						opposed
35	Carmen	opera	2013/06/03		Project opera	GA	no						Vorlage:Y infobox	30 Aug 2014
36	Nixon in China (opera)	opera	2013/06/04	Versionsvergleich		GA	no	2013/06/04		per project discussion	Nikkimaria	no
37	Das Rheingold	opera	2013/06/19	try infobox		GA	no	2013/07/11	restore Template:Wagner operas until there is consensus for this change ...		Robert.Allen	no	side navbox
38	L'incoronazione di Poppea	opera	2013/06/19	try infobox		GA	edits	2013/06/19	FA, best to discuss that first		Nikkimaria	no	identibox
39	La Navarraise	opera	2013/06/20	try infobox		GA	no	2013/07/08	restore top right navbox and rmv duplicate per talk page		Kleinzach	no	side navbox
40	Die Meistersinger von Nürnberg	opera	2013/06/21	try infobox		GA	no	2013/07/08	restore ...		Robert.Allen	no	side navbox
41	Joseph (opera)	opera	2013/06/25	try infobox ...		GA	no	2013/07/08	Replacing the infobox with the navbox per the discussion on the talk page		Kleinzach	no	side navbox	footer navbox removed, also infoboxes and footer navbox in the other operas by Méhul
42	Die Walküre	opera	2013/06/26	try infobox ...		GA	no	2013/07/08	restore ...		Robert.Allen	no	side navbox
43	Die Feen	opera	2013/06/29	try infobox ...		GA	no	2013/07/08	restore ...		Robert.Allen	no	side navbox
44	Falstaff (opera)	opera	2013/06/30	try infobox ...		GA	no	2013/06/30	unsuitable infobox		Michael Bednarek	no
45	Don Carlos	opera	2013/07/06	replace ...		GA	no	2013/07/11	infobox still under development.		Michael Bednarek	no		long discussion, see below
46	Rigoletto	opera	2013/07/06	replace ...		GA	no	2013/07/29	Restoring original per WP:BRD. Please establish consensus on the talk age before restoring!		Eusebeus			long discussion
47	Das Liebesverbot	opera	2013/07/17	infobox		GA	edits	2013/08/04	revert to template: see talk		Smerus	no	side navbox	reverted back, and reverted again
48	Mont Juic (suite)	musical	2013/07/23	infobox		GA	no	2013/07/23	restore, fmt		Nikkimaria	no	shortened	author likes it
49	Fatinitza	opera	2013/07/23		infobox	GA	no						Vorlage:Y infobox
50	Götterdämmerung	opera	2013/08/02	try infobox, as an option of Project Opera		GA	no	2013/08/02	Revert infobox - unreasonable to insert without discussion		Smerus	no	side navbox
51	Cantata academica	musical	2013/08/05	try infobox		GA	edits	2013/07/23	rm: several errors or oversimplifications, net negative; also per previous agreement. feel free to discuss on talk		Nikkimaria	edits		talk
52	Siegfried	opera	2013/08/06		Infobox	GA	no
53	Der Ring des Nibelungen	opera	2013/08/13	try infobox, as an option of Project Opera		GA	edits	2013/08/13	why don't we try the same navbox that we use on all the other Wagner opera articles; I don't know why it wasn't added here in the first place		Robert.Allen		side navbox	side navbox new
54	Geist und Seele wird verwirret, BWV 35	Bach	2013/08/13	infobox		GA	edits	2013/08/13	rv: multiple problems, will incorporate fixes momentarily		Nikkimaria	edits
55	Giuseppe Verdi	person	2013/08/13		Infobox	GA	no
56	Peter Warlock	person	2013/08/15	(infobox)		Catsmeat	no	2013/08/16	Reverted to revision 566939132 by Mandarax: see talk page. (TW)		Smerus	no		edit war
57	BWV 71	Bach	2013/08/20	infobox		GA	edits	2013/08/21	rm infobox pending consensus for this change via discussion on Talk. Thanks!		Eusebeus	edits		22 August: short musical composition, reverted by Nikki
58	Symphony No. 8 (Dvořák)	composition	2013/08/30	infobox		GA	yes	2013/09/01	rm infobox pending consensus from talk per fields to include (if any)		Tim riley	no	Vorlage:Y infobox
59	Cello Concerto (Elgar)	composition	2013/09/01	try infobox		GA	no	2013/09/02	Poor old Cello Concerto! Why inflict an idiot box on this when the other major works escape?		Eusebeus	no

Discussions

Some discussions need a closer view:

• Sparrow Mass, an edit war that lead to the protection of the page
• Richard Wagner does not appear in the table because I never suggested an infobox, knowing about the principle author's dislike of them. I only posted one on the talk page, following a recommendation by Newyorkbrad. The (unnecessary) discussion that followed was a discussion as if it had been suggested for the article, and showed the positions of several users clearly.
• Don Carlos where an infobox suggested was to replace the redundant side navbox Verdi operas in the position of an infobox, redundant because it duplicated navbox Giuseppe Verdi. In order to avoid the side navbox being redundant, it was improved by a better picture, and the other navbox removed without a discussion from almost all Verdi operas. Needless to say that the removed navbox, which had been in place since March 2013, should appear in all articles it links to. At present, the side navbox is in place. See also the project discussion which shows several advantages of an infobox for the specific opera, but so far not one for a side navbox on the other operas/works of the composer (other than "We always did it that way").

Compare articles, with infobox and without

The following table establishes an easy comparison of articles where infobox are debated, showing them with and without infobox. If the infobox is in the present version, please help yourself to a version without it (in imagination or history). Sometimes a shortened/collapsed state is also shown, especially if it is the present version. In some case, the column shows a comparable example of a successful infobox.

	Article	class	type	date	without infobox	with infobox	shortened / collapsed	compare	principal author	notes
	Georg Solti	TFA	person	2012/07/25	present	template		Franz Kafka	Tim riley
	Pilgrim at Tinker Creek	after TFA	book	2012/09/18	present	iBox		Duino Elegies	Yllosubmarine
3	Andreas Scholl		person	2012/11/28		Vorlage:Y			GA, George Ponderevo, Malleus Fatuorum	one of my favourite edits, by GP: we should propagate good ideas whenever we find them
4	Arthur Worsley		person	2012/12/19		Vorlage:Y
5	Carleton W. Angell		person	2012/12/21		Vorlage:Y
6	Forsbrook Pendant		artwork	2012/12/29		Vorlage:Y
	Cosima Wagner	after TFA	person	2012/12/26	present	iBox			Brianboulton
7	Dancing Barry		person	2012/12/30		Vorlage:Y
8	Mass in B minor structure	DYK	Bach	2013/01/01		infobox	present: collapsed parameters		GA
9	BWV 105		Bach	2013/01/01	present	try infobox		BWV 76	Mathsci
10	Robert Callahan (judge)		person	2013/01/02	present	iBox
11	Hans Severus Ziegler		person	2013/01/02		Vorlage:Y			Andy
12	Lloyd Hartman Elliott		person	2013/01/02		Vorlage:Y
13	Howell Conant		person	2013/01/07		iBox	shortened
14	Messiah structure	for TFA, DYK	musical	2013/01/08		start infobox	present: shortened and collapsed		GA
15	Christopher Pinchbeck		person	2013/01/17		Vorlage:Y
16	Russian Symphony Orchestra Society		musical artist	2013/01/29	present	see talk		Nordwestdeutsche Philharmonie
17	Renaissance Theatre Company		organization	2013/02/19		Vorlage:Y
18	Messiah Part I	for TFA, DYK	musical	2013/02/23		Vorlage:Y			GA	and Parts II and III on Handel's birthday
19	Cathedral of Blessed Mother Teresa in Pristina		church	2013/03/01	present	image +		St. Martin, Idstein
20	Robert Stoepel		person	2013/03/04		Vorlage:Y			kosboot
21	Peter Planyavsky	DYK	person	2013/03/04	revert	Talk:Peter Planyavsky#Infobox	present: shortened	Graham Waterhouse	GA
22	Penns Hall		building	2013/03/10	present	iBox
23	Reginald Aspinwall		person	2013/03/13	present	+
24	Johann Sebastian Bach		person	2013/03/21	present	Birthday		Karlheinz Oswald
25	George Frideric Handel		person	2013/03/25	present	Mini-infobox
26	St Matthew Passion structure	DYK	Bach	2013/03/28		infobox	present: shortened, collapsed parameters		GA
27	Holzhausenschlösschen	DYK	building	2013/03/30		Vorlage:Y			GA, Giano, Malleus Fatuorum, Andy
28	Sparrow Mass		musical	2013/03/30	present	WP:QAI/Infobox		Mass No. 6 (Schubert)
29	BWV 103	GA	Bach	2013/04/15		Vorlage:Y			GA
30	St Mary's, Bryanston Square		church	2013/04/15		template	present: shortened, collapsed parameters
31	St. Severin, Keitum		church	2013/04/26		Vorlage:Y			Dr. Blofeld, Ipigott
32	Jochem Hendricks		person	2013/05/02		Vorlage:Y
33	Sally Ryan		person	2013/05/02		Vorlage:Y
	Richard Wagner	for TFA	person	2013/05/13	present	Wagner special			Smerus
34	The Rite of Spring	after TFA	musical	2013/05/30	present	Infobox facts			Brianboulton
35	Carmen	after TFA	opera	2013/06/03	present	Project opera			Brianboulton
36	Nixon in China (opera)	FA	opera	2013/06/04	present	Infobox			Brianboulton
37	Das Rheingold		opera	2013/06/19	side navbox	try infobox		Der Ring des Nibelungen
38	L'incoronazione di Poppea	FA	opera	2013/06/19	side navbox	try infobox			Brianboulton
39	La Navarraise		opera	2013/06/20	side navbox	try infobox
40	Die Meistersinger von Nürnberg		opera	2013/06/21	side navbox	try infobox
41	Joseph (opera)		opera	2013/06/25	side navbox	try infobox				footer navbox removed, also infoboxes and footer navbox in 11 other operas by Méhul
42	Die Walküre		opera	2013/06/26	side navbox	try infobox
43	Die Feen		opera	2013/06/29	side navbox	try infobox
44	Falstaff (opera)		opera	2013/06/30	side navbox	try infobox				footer navbox removed
45	Don Carlos		opera	2013/07/06	side navbox	Talk:Don Carlos/Archive 1#Infobox				footer navbox removed, suggestion for two infoboxes
46	Rigoletto		opera	2013/07/06	side navbox	replace
47	Das Liebesverbot		opera	2013/07/17	side navbox	infobox
48	Mont Juic (suite)	DYK	musical	2013/07/23		Talk:Mont Juic (suite)	present: shortened	Hymn to St. Cecilia	JackofOz
49	Fatinitza	GA nom	opera	2013/07/23		Vorlage:Y			Adam Cuerden	for GA, also 3 other operettas by Suppé
50	Götterdämmerung		opera	2013/08/02	side navbox	infobox
	Duino Elegies	TFA	book	2013/08/03		Vorlage:Y			ColonelHenry
51	Cantata academica	DYK	musical	2013/08/05	present		Talk:Cantata academica	Missa Brevis (Britten)
52	Siegfried		opera	2013/08/06	present	Infobox
53	Der Ring des Nibelungen		opera	2013/08/13	side navbox	infobox
54	Geist und Seele wird verwirret, BWV 35		Bach	2013/08/13	present	Infobox		BWV 169
55	Peter Warlock	FA	person	2013/08/15	reverted	present			Brianboulton
56	Giuseppe Verdi		opera	2013/08/13	present	Infobox
57	BWV 71		Bach	2013/08/20	present	infobox		BWV 131	Thoughtfortheday
58	Symphony No. 8 (Dvořák)	DYK	composition	2013/08/30		Vorlage:Y			Gerda Arendt
59	Cello Concerto (Elgar)		composition	2013/09/01	present	try infobox

Table II of debated infoboxes

The following sortable (not comprehensive) table shows several infoboxes that are or were under debate, {{Infobox person}}, {{Infobox Bach composition}} (short: Bach), {{Infobox musical composition}} (short: composition), {{Infobox opera}} . Reactions to added infoboxes range from a complete revert to collapsing of sections, shortening by deletion of parameters or information, and discussion. The latter is wanted. It can be improved by leaving an infobox in place for a certain minimum time, to also gain input from readers. The table entries are sorted by date of installation/suggestion of an infobox but can be sorted by other fields. The background colour is red when no infobox is present. If you find that the state is not up to date, please change.

Article	type	date	added	by	date	reverted	changed	by	notes
Symphony No. 5 (Bruckner)	composition	2007			2014/07/01		mos, refs, simplify	Nikkimaria
Symphony No. 8 (Bruckner)	composition	2007			2014/07/01		mos, refs, simplify	Nikkimaria	disc, data removed
Symphony No. 1 (Bruckner)	composition	2007			2014/07/23		tr	Nikkimaria
Joseph Priestley	person	2011/10/04	infobox		2011/10/04	no consensus for infobox whiich mentions none of his religious or philosphy achievements		Ruhrfisch
Missa (Bach)	composition	2013/01/03	try infobox	GA	2014/10/26	re-integrate content that was split-off for no apparent reason		Francis Schonken
Missa in B minor (Bach)	composition	2013/02/13	A separate article on Kyrie and Gloria (BWV 232a) of the Mass in B minor (BWV 232), composed as a set much earlier	GA	2014/10/26	re-integrate in Missa (Bach), split serves no purpose		Francis Schonken	redirected 3 more times, draft on 28 Oct, latest renamed and expanded
Victor Bruns	person	2013/12/08	infobox for an article I created	GA	2013/12/09	not so		Nikkimaria
Polish Requiem	composition	2014/02/24	infobox for an article I created	GA	2014/02/25	rv per AC		Nikkimaria
Toilet paper orientation		2014/05/07	Necessary details	MTBW	2014/05/07	previous version was preferable		Nikkimaria	one more rv
Richard Adeney	person	2014/06/02	infobox for an article I created	GA	2014/02/25	not so		Nikkimaria
String Quartet (Bruckner)	composition (2)	2014/06/29	Infoboxes String quartet & Alternative rondo	Meneerke bloem	2014/06/29	mos, ce, rm 2nd		Nikkimaria	similar: String Quintet (Bruckner)
Anna Kravtchenko	person	2014/07/15	fmt, expnd	MTBW	2014/07/16	rv: net negative, no consensus for mass additions, please discuss on talk first		Nikkimaria	restored
José Carlos Cocarelli	person (10)	2014/07/15	fmt, expnd	MTBW	2014/07/16	rv: net negative ...		Nikkimaria	2 more rounds of reverts, restored, 10 similar cases
Herr Gott, Beherrscher aller Dinge, BWV 120a	Bach	2014/08/30	Added infobox, removed wl from boldface ...	Finnusertop	2014/08/30	rv bold edit: given rationale insufficient to warrant that change		Nikkimaria
Intermezzo in D minor (Bruckner)	composition	2014/09/05	Merge two versions, provide additional material left behind in the redirect	Montanabw	2014/09/05	integrate some old content with existing text and style		Nikkimaria	Infobox originally in String Quintet
Rondo in C minor (Bruckner)	composition	2014/09/05	data forgotten during the split (with refs)	Meneerke bloem	2014/09/05	integrate some old content with existing text and style		Nikkimaria	Infobox originally in String Quartet, removed twice
Locus iste (Bruckner)	composition	2014/10/05	Ō xein', angellein Lakegerdamoniois hoti tēde keimetha tois keinōn rhēmasi peithomenoi.	Serten	2014/10/05	restore for GAN		Nikkimaria	reverted a few times
Missa, BWV 233	composition	2013/09/08	Single work split from Missa (Bach), a start	GA	2014/10/26	separate article serves no purpose		Francis Schonken	the other three missae similarly

As of 7 September 2014, there are 70 transclusions of {{Infobox opera}}, 175 of {{Infobox Bach composition}}, and 187 of {{Infobox musical composition}}. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:49, 7 September 2014 (UTC) As of 5 October 2014, there are 75 transclusions of infobox opera, 184 of Bach and 196 of composition. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:36, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

Table of inclusions of musical composition infoboxes

Date	Composition	Bach	Opera
7 Sep	187	175	70
5 Oct	196	184	75
22 Oct	207	188	74

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:28, 22 October 2014 (UTC)

Invitations posted

Thus far following invitations have been posted:

• User talk:Gerda Arendt/Infobox (where prior content of the current page has been moved)
• Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Infoboxes
• Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Quality Article Improvement
• Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)
• Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style
• Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Infoboxes
• Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Infoboxes

I propose every on- or off-wiki invitation to the current debate be logged here. Invitations may need to be scrutinized by an uninvolved admin in view of WP:CANVASS#Inappropriate notification: for invitations not logged here that could very likely mean a dramaboard-like development for instance at WP:ANI (which I'd avoid). --Francis Schonken (talk) 12:41, 9 November 2014 (UTC); Updated 13:39, 9 November 2014 (UTC)

Moved material and restored

One user moved the entire contents of this page to another users's userspace without consensus. This screwed up a lot of links at other pages and caused general disruption. I have restored this material. Now discuss. Montanabw^(talk) 21:42, 9 November 2014 (UTC)

I don't mind the copy of the old material, that *also* is at User:Gerda Arendt/Infobox. At least the cross-namespace redirect is no longer in place.

But we don't need the old material, when properly linked (as it was before Montanabw's intervention [2])

So I propose to have no duplicate copy of what belongs in user namespace, and link to Gerda's reflections and interpretations appropriately from the top of the page. --Francis Schonken (talk) 22:07, 9 November 2014 (UTC)

Page layout

I prefer the new discussion at the top of the page, as long as the old userfied content is doubled here. --Francis Schonken (talk) 06:27, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

Anyway I'm not going to put my thoughts under a text that on the top of the page starts with "The following thoughts were initiated by Gerda Arendt (Diskussion • Beiträge • gelöschte Beiträge • hochgeladene Dateien • SBL-Log • Sperr-Logbuch • globale Beiträge • SUL • Logbuch • sperren) ..." My thoughts shouldn't be usurped by anyone, tx. --Francis Schonken (talk) 06:34, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

I've moved the discussion from the project page to this, the talk page; pending a proper fix of the mess you've made.Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 14:40, 11 November 2014 (UTC)

Moved from main page

I want to make this a page for (the preparation of) Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Infoboxes#Community discussion recommended (Remedy six of the infoboxes case): Vorlage:Quotation--Francis Schonken (talk) 11:30, 9 November 2014 (UTC)

Issue 1: visibility of infoboxes in generated PDF

See [3] — should this issue be raised in the wider community discussion on infoboxes? --Francis Schonken (talk) 11:30, 9 November 2014 (UTC)

This may be a silly question, but wouldn't it be better to fix the PDF problem so that infoboxes are printed. Did PDF generation not use to print infoboxes? Was there a discussion about this somewhere?

If the question is raised, should the text not first be changed to the more logical

• "The PDF version of a Wikipedia page (generated with the "Download as PDF" link) does not include the Infobox, so the infobox should not contain anything that is essential to the article, and is not otherwise repeated in the article body."

--Boson (talk) 16:19, 9 November 2014 (UTC)

Don't know whether that would be a (technical) fix, or something that is disabled by design. Feel free to ask the question to the tech people involved in the PDF module and/or those maintaining the code of the infobox umbrella template. My question is: should we involve community discussion on whether the community thinks it should be one way or the other?

Regarding the understandability of the sentence I typed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Infoboxes#Disadvantages of infoboxes, please improve if you think it unclear or incorrect, it's not like I own the sentence. --Francis Schonken (talk) 19:15, 9 November 2014 (UTC)

┌────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ Infoboxes are printed when the article is printed, so it nonsense to suggest that there is a problem with printing. It is true that creating a downloadable pdf of an article omits the infobox, but the solution is to amend the routine that excludes the infobox (or better to give the downloader the choice). Infoboxes are far too useful (see Wikipedia:WikiProject Infoboxes #Benefits of infoboxes to be ripping them out of articles merely because of their exclusion from downloaded pdfs. --RexxS (talk) 19:57, 9 November 2014 (UTC)

Please see Wikipedia:WikiProject Infoboxes#Disadvantages of infoboxes, there's no "printing" mentioned in the description of the problem (unless when the PDF is printed as I did some days ago). Let's not concentrate on the non-issues, please. --Francis Schonken (talk) 20:07, 9 November 2014 (UTC)

See Vorlage:Diff2 with the edit summary "apparently the image isn't printed/PDF-ed when enclosed in a navbox". If you're going to claim that a "navbox" (you meant infobox) isn't printed, then you're making that assertion and I have simply explained to you that you're mistaken. You raised the non-issue, not I. --RexxS (talk) 20:16, 9 November 2014 (UTC)

In the mean while I've directed to at least three places where the problem is identified to exclusively the generated PDF, I'd rewrite the edit summary when I could, but as said, let's not concentrate on non-issues.

The generated PDF is the issue, not the direct printing. --Francis Schonken (talk) 20:21, 9 November 2014 (UTC)

On reflection, I assume that the reference to printing is this: there is software available that 'prints' to a pdf file on disc, rather than to paper on a printer. Examples include PrimoPDF, Print-to-PDF, CutePDF and many more. If anyone wants a pdf of the article that includes the infobox, they can simply use one of those free programs to produce a pdf that contains everything that would be printed onto paper - and that includes the infobox, of course. I think you're imagining a problem that simply does not exist. --RexxS (talk) 20:23, 9 November 2014 (UTC)

I know. I use PDFCreator (open source software). That is not the problem. The method offered by Wikipedia does not print the infobox, so the most direct line to a PDF file results in an incomplete article (if information/images not contained in the rest of the article are only included in the infobox).

Further, I prefer the two-column layout of the Wikipedia-generated PDF, also for reading on paper.

That's how I found out. I had a visit from my father a few days ago, and wanted to give him a print of what I was doing lately, generated and printed the PDF, but only saw afterwards the image was missing.

In fact it's about the contradiction between the WP:LEADIMAGE recommendations and the result of the PDF generated by Wikipedia: the lead image should be unique and highly representative of the article, which usually leads to an image not repeated in the body of the article. So no, this doesn't work well together with the PDF generation offered by Wikipedia. --Francis Schonken (talk) 20:35, 9 November 2014 (UTC)

Then that is purely an artefact of the process used by the mediawiki software; it's not a fault of the infobox. Using the "Printable version" link followed by printing through a pdf generator requires exactly the same number of steps as using the "Download as PDF" link followed by saving the generated pdf to disc. I don't accept that the latter is any more direct than the former, and surely you can see that having the option to create a pdf with or without an infobox is actually a benefit, not a disadvantage? --RexxS (talk) 20:56, 9 November 2014 (UTC)

Re. "artefact of the process used by the mediawiki software; it's not a fault of the infobox":

1. I don't know, maybe it depends on the infobox umbrella template (which equals "the infobox", most other templates are included in the PDF and/or are printable, so I don't see why this one couldn't be made this way)
2. The actual issue raised here is whether or not the Wikipedia community should decide what the software should do. I'm sure whatever the community decides, the software can be managed to do it.

It's not about the number of steps, it's about the ease with which incomplete versions of articles can be produced. For BWV 243a I don't care with the current image in the infobox: that image is not OK for WP:LEADIMAGE, non-essential to the article, I couldn't care whether or not it is included in PDF and printed versions. Same for the image in the infobox at Rondo in C minor (Bruckner): image not OK for WP:LEADIMAGE (see talk page discussion on that one), non-essential to the article, couldn't care less when versions of that article without the infobox are spread. But the problem arises when the image in the infobox *is* OK with WP:LEADIMAGE, then the image becomes an unmissable part of the article, and I think it a bad idea that incomplete versions of the article can be spread easily.

The general background is also that I was indifferent (completely in balance) about infoboxes: for me advantages and disadvantages of infoboxes were equally strong, so I felt indifferent about them (I can give proof of that when needed), until a few days ago this minor difference added slightly to the disadvantages, so now for articles that have an essential image in the infobox, I'm against the infobox.

Again, the thing that needs to be solved in the first place imho is whether or not we want images in infoboxes to conform to WP:LEADIMAGE, if so I want to know in the next step what the community thinks about the inclusion yes or no in the PDF generated directly by the Wikipedia software. We don't want people who click the "download as PDF" link to know in advance it discerns images on whether or not they are included in what we call infoboxes, but what an average reader is not expected to be familiar with. --Francis Schonken (talk) 21:22, 9 November 2014 (UTC)

The pdf link creates a totally scewed up article; I just tried it and it also omits the table of contents! The software is buggy; definitely us the "print version" link. Montanabw^(talk) 04:20, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

(FYI: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Quality Article Improvement/Infobox#Moved material and restored discusses the page layout now)

I don't think the generated PDF is "totally scewed up" (sic). Anyway, seems like this is something where a wider community input would be welcome. --Francis Schonken (talk) 06:32, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

Generally, I'd recommend participants in this discussion to give up WP:BATTLEGROUND attitudes, per Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Infoboxes#Editors reminded (remedy five of the arbcom case). About the issue discussed in this talk page section I suppose at least two routes can be explored, probably best both:

1. Have a closer look at the techical angle (as I already suggested above), ask the ones responsible for the PDF-generating module, see whether a minor change in the infobox umbrella template can solve the issue, etc...
2. Prepare the wider community discussion as recommended by ArbCom (remedy six of the ArbCom case as quoted above)

I'm no supporter of the attitude of "denial" either, suggesting there's no problem, and anyone should know (how?) that the PDF-generating software provided by Wikipedia shouldn't be used etc. I regard that as a non-constructive attitude, akin to battleground attitude. --Francis Schonken (talk) 07:15, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

Further continuation of discussions in Wikipedia: and Wikipedia talk: namespaces

• Recommended talk page to continue the discussion above: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Quality Article Improvement/Infobox
• See Wikipedia:WikiProject Quality Article Improvement/Infobox for the framework of the discussions
• Any content above on this page (or on User:Gerda Arendt/Infobox), and relevant to (get the) the community discussion as intended by remedy six of the infoboxes arbitration case (started) can be copied/merged to one of the pages linked in the two first bullets above. --Francis Schonken (talk) 12:17, 9 November 2014 (UTC)

I uncollapsed the active discussion, leaving this for history. Any neutral discussion of infoboxes should NOT be on the pages of this project which supports them, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:23, 2 December 2014 (UTC)

Archive 2

Archive 2015

The following discussion was initiated by Gerda Arendt (Diskussion • Beiträge • gelöschte Beiträge • hochgeladene Dateien • SBL-Log • Sperr-Logbuch • globale Beiträge • SUL • Logbuch • sperren) in June 2013.

I dream of the day that the infobox is a simple tool of accessibility.

Table of inclusions of musical composition infoboxes

{{Infobox musical composition}} {{Infobox Bach composition}} {{Infobox opera}}

2015 stats

Date	Composition	Bach	Opera
1 Jan 2015	256	185	100
2 Feb 2015	293	186	118
2 Mar 2015	334	186	123
2 Apr 2015	349	187	127
2 May 2015	357	187	131
2 Jun 2015	369	187	136
1 Jul 2015	409	189	143
1 Aug 2015	422	188	157
30 Aug 2015	433	193	164
1 Oct 2015	440	196	170
1 Nov 2015	444	197	177
1 Dec 2015	453	199	180
31 Dec 2015	498	202	184

January: Don Giovanni --Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:37, 1 January 2015 (UTC)

April: Lohengrin --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:00, 2 May 2015 (UTC)

May: Beethoven --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:03, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

July: The Ban on Love --Gerda Arendt (talk) 05:32, 1 August 2015 (UTC)

August: Geist und Seele wird verwirret, BWV 35 --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:55, 1 October 2015 (UTC)

October: Johann Sebastian Bach --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:43, 1 November 2015 (UTC)

November: Joseph (opera) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:55, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

December: Sibelius --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:21, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

Discussions and reverts

The dates indicate when an infobox was installed that was later reverted, or suggested but not accepted. The colour red indicates no infobox.

2015

Article	type	date
Michael Tippett	person	2 Jan TFA
Ian Bostridge	person	17 Jan
Rose Leclerc	person	21 Jan
Albert Ketèlbey	person	28 Jan
Adoration of the Shepherds (Domenichino)	artwork	11 Feb
Franz Liszt	person	13 Feb
Lulu Wang	person	8 Mar
James Joyce	person	3 Jun RfC
Mass in C major (Beethoven)	composition	22 Jun
Lohengrin (opera)	opera	27 Aug
Die Laune des Verliebten	opera	27 Aug
Die Hochzeit	opera	27 Aug
Männerlist größer als Frauenlist	opera	27 Aug
Tannhäuser (opera)	opera	27 Aug
Rienzi	opera	27 Aug
The Marriage of Figaro	opera	16 Sep
Gioachino Rossini	person	20 Dec
Eileen Sharp	musical artist	6 Dec

2014

Article	type	date
Symphony No. 5 (Bruckner)	composition
Symphony No. 8 (Bruckner)	composition
Symphony No. 1 (Bruckner)	composition
Missa in B minor (Bach)	Bach
Trayvon Martin	person	11 Jan
Polish Requiem	composition	24 Feb
Franciszek Mączyński	ibox	1 Apr
John McCabe	person	20 Apr
Toilet paper orientation	ibox	7 May
Talk:Georges Bizet	person	20 May
Richard Adeney	person
String Quartet (Bruckner)	composition
String Quintet (Bruckner)	composition
Anna Kravtchenko	person
José Carlos Cocarelli	person (10 cases)
Sophie Dahl	person	28 Jul
Chopin	person	25 Aug
Herr Gott, Beherrscher aller Dinge, BWV 120a	Bach	30 Aug
Intermezzo in D minor (Bruckner)	composition
Rondo in C minor (Bruckner)	composition
Locus iste (Bruckner)	composition
Missa (Bach)	Bach	26 Oct
Missa, BWV 233	Bach (4)	26 Oct
Colleen Evans	person	Talk:Colleen Evans 28 Oct + 6
Yeats	person	24 Nov
Beethoven	person	29 Nov
John Gielgud	person	4 Dec

2013

The numbered articles were presented (with more detail) as evidence in the arbcom case in 2013.

	Article	type	date
1	Symphony No. 1 (Bruckner)	composition	(2007)
	Robert Stoepel	person
	Orlando furioso	opera
	Motezuma	opera
2	Philipp Glass	musician
	John Le Mesurier	person
3	Andreas Scholl	person
4	Arthur Worsley	person
5	Carleton W. Angell	person
6	Forsbrook Pendant	artwork
7	Dancing Barry	person
8	Mass in B minor structure	Bach
9	BWV 105	Bach
10	Robert Callahan (judge)	person
11	Hans Severus Ziegler	person
12	Lloyd Hartman Elliott	person
13	Howell Conant	person
14	Messiah structure	composition
15	Christopher Pinchbeck	person
16	Russian Symphony Orchestra Society	musical artist
17	Renaissance Theatre Company	organization
18	Messiah Part I	composition
19	Cathedral of Blessed Mother Teresa in Pristina	church
20	Robert Stoepel	person
21	Peter Planyavsky	person
22	Penns Hall	building
23	Reginald Aspinwall	person
24	Johann Sebastian Bach	person
25	George Frideric Handel	person
26	St Matthew Passion structure	Bach
27	Holzhausenschlösschen	building
28	Sparrow Mass	composition
29	BWV 103	Bach
30	St Mary's, Bryanston Square	church
31	St. Severin, Keitum	church
32	Jochem Hendricks	person
33	Sally Ryan	person
34	The Rite of Spring	composition
35	Carmen	opera
36	Nixon in China (opera)	opera
37	Das Rheingold	opera	27 Aug 2015
38	L'incoronazione di Poppea	opera
39	La Navarraise	opera
40	Die Meistersinger von Nürnberg	opera	27 Aug 2015
41	Joseph (opera)	opera	22 Jun
42	Die Walküre	opera	27 Aug 2015
43	Die Feen	opera	27 Aug 2015
44	Falstaff (opera)	opera
45	Don Carlos	opera
46	Rigoletto	opera
47	Das Liebesverbot	opera	27 Aug 2015
48	Mont Juic (suite)	composition
49	Fatinitza	opera
	William Burges	person
50	Götterdämmerung	opera	25 Aug 2015
51	Cantata academica	composition
52	Siegfried	opera	25 Aug 2015
53	Der Ring des Nibelungen	opera	25 Aug 2015
54	Geist und Seele wird verwirret, BWV 35	Bach
55	Giuseppe Verdi	person	t 13 Aug
56	Peter Warlock	person
57	BWV 71	Bach
58	Symphony No. 8 (Dvořák)	composition
59	Cello Concerto (Elgar)	composition
	Romeo and Juliet (Tchaikovsky)	composition
	Joseph Priestley	person	2 Sep 2013
	Victor Bruns	person
	Jauchzet Gott in allen Landen, BWV 51	Bach	4 Sep
	Ich geh und suche mit Verlangen, BWV 49	Bach	10 Oct

Before

Article	type	date
Frank Sinatra	person	18 Dec 2005
Mozart	person	6 May 2006
Laurence Olivier	person	25 May 2006
Rod Steiger	person	7 July 2006
Jean Sibelius	person	31 Jul 2006
Cary Grant	person	6 Jun 2006 - 15 Jun 2016
Catherine Zeta-Jones	person	14 August 2006
Deepika Padukone	person	21 August 2006, 30 Oct 2014
Peter Sellers	person	12 Nov 2006
George Formby	person	15 Feb 2007
Daisy Dormer	person	15 Feb 2007
Georg Solti	person	20 Mar 2007
Isaac Stern	person	22 Jul 2007
Kenneth Horne	person	19 Sep 2007
Richard Harris (composer)	person	30 June 2008
Victor Bedikian	ibox	25 October 2009
Samuel Barber	person	6 Dec 2009
Test Match Sofa	radio show	7 Dec 2010
Blues dance	ibox	17 Nov 2011
Noël Coward	person	2 Dec 2011, RfC 15 Aug 2016, closed 29 Aug, but
Character of the Happy Warrior	ibox, now poem
I Wandered Lonely as a Cloud	ibox, now poem
Camille Saint-Saëns	person	12 May 2012
Poor Susan	ibox, now poem
Ian Fleming	person	27 Jul 2012
Josephine Butler	person	9 Aug 2012

latest entry --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:38, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

Why we use infoboxes

Where is the links to the stats on the percentage of wikipedia articles with infoboxes and also where is that cool list of good reasons to have infoboxes? Can we link them here for easy access? Montanabw^(talk) 19:44, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia:WikiProject Infoboxes/Statistics, but please note it is well out of date. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 22:08, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

Also Wikipedia:WikiProject Infoboxes#Benefits of infoboxes. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 22:12, 2 February 2015 (UTC)