Diskussion:Rundmäuler

Letzter Kommentar: vor 2 Jahren von KnightMove in Abschnitt Cyclostomata are not jawless fishes

Der 2. Teil des Artikels sollte nach Neunauge verschoben werden. Allerdings gibt mir zu denken, dass die Angaben zur Ernährung widersprüchlich sind.

--Salitos 22:29, 9. Mai 2004 (CEST)Beantworten

Was sind den "unsere Gewässer"?--D.W. 23:33, 14. Okt. 2006 (CEST)Beantworten

Quellen für eine Revalidierung der Cyclostomata Bearbeiten

  • Delarbre Christiane, Gallut Cyril, Barriel Veronique, Janvier Philippe, Gachelin Gabriel (2002): Complete mitochondrial DNA of the hagfish, Eptatretus burgeri: The comparative analysis of mitochondrial DNA sequences strongly supports the cyclostome monophyly. Molecular phylogenetics and evolution 22 (2): 184–192. doi:10.1006/mpev.2001.1045
  • Kuraku, Shigehiro, Ota, Kinya G., & Kuratani, Shigeru, S. Blair (2009b): Jawless fishes (Cyclostomata). In S.B. Hedges & S. Kumar. Timetree of Life. Oxford University Press. pp. 317–319. ISBN 978-0-19-953503-3
  • Shigehiro Kuraku, Shigeru Kuratani: Time scale for cyclostome evolution inferred with a phylogenetic diagnosis of hagfish and lamprey cDNA sequences. Zoolog Sci. 2006 Dec;23(12):1053-64. PDF
  • Mallatt J, Sullivan J.: 28S and 18S rDNA sequences support the monophyly of lampreys and hagfishes. Mol Biol Evol. 1998 Dec;15(12): 1706-18. PDF
  • Jon Mallatt, Christopher J. Winchell: Ribosomal RNA genes and deuterostome phylogeny revisited: More cyclostomes, elasmobranchs, reptiles, and a brittle star. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, Volume 43, Issue 3, June 2007, Pages 1005-1022 doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2006.11.023
  • Alysha M. Heimberg, Richard Cowper-Sal·lari, Marie Sémon, Philip C. J. Donoghue & Kevin J. Peterson: microRNAs reveal the interrelationships of hagfish, lampreys, and gnathostomes and the nature of the ancestral vertebrate. PNAS November 9, 2010 vol. 107 no. 45 19379-19383 doi:10.1073/pnas.1010350107

Cyclostomata are not jawless fishes Bearbeiten

Dear german Wikipedians. I found a deeply rooted mistake, probably due to historical changes in the names of the animals: Cyclostomata is currently the name of a group of bryozoans, which is also called as Cyclostomatidea. The living jawless fishes belong to the Superclass Cyclostomi. Unfortunately, in English, the vulgar term "cyclostome" is used for both, fishes and bryozoans. I hope to have contributed to your Wikipedia. Leider spreche ich wenig Deutsch.--Fernando Archuby (Diskussion) 19:05, 10. Okt. 2021 (CEST)Beantworten

Well, it is established that the name Cyclostomata applies to both groups. I ask our biologists to recheck whether the rules indicate to use Cyclostomi now or not. --KnightMove (Diskussion) 07:45, 11. Okt. 2021 (CEST)Beantworten
In the project, it was declared that both names are valid, so I have added the old one again. --KnightMove (Diskussion) 10:47, 12. Okt. 2021 (CEST)Beantworten